PROJECT-07 · Undergraduate · ENGLISH · PLANNED
Start with a delivery problem, build the project artifact, simulate a change and defend the decision.
Study time is an initial activity estimate, excluding extra reading, revision and extended laboratory or project work. Videos and question bodies have not been produced by adding this outline.
Complete these courses or demonstrate equivalent knowledge. These are recommended prerequisites, not enforced enrolment locks.
YouTube playlist: ARK Project Management | Project Leadership, Teams and Stakeholders
Playlist title reserved in the plan; no YouTube playlist or upload has been created yet.
Sign in to save this learning pathPractical outcome: Create a working agreement for a distributed student team.
Explain team formation using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Create a working agreement for a distributed student team. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain role clarity using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Create a working agreement for a distributed student team. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain responsibility matrices using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Create a working agreement for a distributed student team. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain psychological safety using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Create a working agreement for a distributed student team. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Use the first concepts from this section. Create a working agreement for a distributed student team. Produce a labelled diagram, trace or calculation; explain each step and check one changed input.
3–6 questions on the preceding first-half concepts only: recall, visual interpretation, application and one plausible misconception. Explain each answer after submission.
Explain motivation using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Create a working agreement for a distributed student team. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain delegation using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Create a working agreement for a distributed student team. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain feedback using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Create a working agreement for a distributed student team. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain conflict resolution using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Create a working agreement for a distributed student team. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Create a working agreement for a distributed student team. Work without the example, compare two cases, record assumptions and limitations, then self-review correctness, reasoning and clarity.
6–12 questions covering Team formation, Role clarity, Responsibility matrices and the remaining section concepts, with cumulative retrieval from earlier sections. Include a new transfer problem; 70% unlocks progression.
Practical outcome: Design different communication plans for sponsors users and suppliers.
Explain stakeholder mapping using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Design different communication plans for sponsors users and suppliers. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain power and interest using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Design different communication plans for sponsors users and suppliers. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain engagement objectives using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Design different communication plans for sponsors users and suppliers. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain listening using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Design different communication plans for sponsors users and suppliers. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Use the first concepts from this section. Design different communication plans for sponsors users and suppliers. Produce a labelled diagram, trace or calculation; explain each step and check one changed input.
3–6 questions on the preceding first-half concepts only: recall, visual interpretation, application and one plausible misconception. Explain each answer after submission.
Explain communication channels using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Design different communication plans for sponsors users and suppliers. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain status reporting using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Design different communication plans for sponsors users and suppliers. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain difficult conversations using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Design different communication plans for sponsors users and suppliers. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain expectation management using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Design different communication plans for sponsors users and suppliers. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Design different communication plans for sponsors users and suppliers. Work without the example, compare two cases, record assumptions and limitations, then self-review correctness, reasoning and clarity.
6–12 questions covering Stakeholder mapping, Power and interest, Engagement objectives and the remaining section concepts, with cumulative retrieval from earlier sections. Include a new transfer problem; 70% unlocks progression.
Practical outcome: Role-play an escalation and document an ethical leadership decision.
Explain influence without authority using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Role-play an escalation and document an ethical leadership decision. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain negotiation preparation using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Role-play an escalation and document an ethical leadership decision. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain facilitation using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Role-play an escalation and document an ethical leadership decision. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain remote collaboration using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Role-play an escalation and document an ethical leadership decision. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Use the first concepts from this section. Role-play an escalation and document an ethical leadership decision. Produce a labelled diagram, trace or calculation; explain each step and check one changed input.
3–6 questions on the preceding first-half concepts only: recall, visual interpretation, application and one plausible misconception. Explain each answer after submission.
Explain cultural differences using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Role-play an escalation and document an ethical leadership decision. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain decision logs using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Role-play an escalation and document an ethical leadership decision. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain ethical dilemmas using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Role-play an escalation and document an ethical leadership decision. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain team learning using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Role-play an escalation and document an ethical leadership decision. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Role-play an escalation and document an ethical leadership decision. Work without the example, compare two cases, record assumptions and limitations, then self-review correctness, reasoning and clarity.
6–12 questions covering Influence without authority, Negotiation preparation, Facilitation and the remaining section concepts, with cumulative retrieval from earlier sections. Include a new transfer problem; 70% unlocks progression.
Combine all three sections: Role-play an escalation and document an ethical leadership decision. Submit an original worked artifact, evidence or tests, assumptions and a reflection. Rubric: correctness, method, practical usefulness, reproducibility and communication. Self-reviewed, not certified.
6–12 balanced questions sampling every section of Project Leadership, Teams and Stakeholders, including interpretation, calculation or reasoning, a misconception and a new application. Passing is 70%; review errors before retrying.
Project charters, schedules, risk registers, delivery simulations and benefits reviews. Guided work leads to an independent attempt, with a diagram, explanation, trace, calculation or tested artifact. Question bodies are generated when opened in your private learning path. Programming submissions are stored as text; the platform does not execute submitted code.
Use original or appropriately licensed datasets. Practical science activities use models or supplied data unless a qualified supervisor has reviewed a physical experiment.
Open the interactive practice sampler →