PHYSICS-11 · Advanced · ENGLISH · PLANNED
Predict, observe a demonstration, draw a model, then test its limits.
Study time is an initial activity estimate, excluding extra reading, revision and extended laboratory or project work. Videos and question bodies have not been produced by adding this outline.
Complete these courses or demonstrate equivalent knowledge. These are recommended prerequisites, not enforced enrolment locks.
YouTube playlist: ARK Physics | Quantum Physics II
Playlist title reserved in the plan; no YouTube playlist or upload has been created yet.
Sign in to save this learning pathPractical outcome: Explain a simple atomic spectral pattern.
Explain orbital angular momentum using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Explain a simple atomic spectral pattern. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain spin using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Explain a simple atomic spectral pattern. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain spin measurement using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Explain a simple atomic spectral pattern. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain angular momentum addition using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Explain a simple atomic spectral pattern. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Use the first concepts from this section. Explain a simple atomic spectral pattern. Produce a labelled diagram, trace or calculation; explain each step and check one changed input.
3–6 questions on the preceding first-half concepts only: recall, visual interpretation, application and one plausible misconception. Explain each answer after submission.
Explain central potentials using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Explain a simple atomic spectral pattern. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain hydrogen wavefunctions using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Explain a simple atomic spectral pattern. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain selection rules using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Explain a simple atomic spectral pattern. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain zeeman effect using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Explain a simple atomic spectral pattern. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain a simple atomic spectral pattern. Work without the example, compare two cases, record assumptions and limitations, then self-review correctness, reasoning and clarity.
6–12 questions covering Orbital angular momentum, Spin, Spin measurement and the remaining section concepts, with cumulative retrieval from earlier sections. Include a new transfer problem; 70% unlocks progression.
Practical outcome: Estimate a small energy shift and state the approximation limit.
Explain non-degenerate perturbation using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Estimate a small energy shift and state the approximation limit. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain degenerate perturbation using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Estimate a small energy shift and state the approximation limit. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain variational method using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Estimate a small energy shift and state the approximation limit. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain wkb approximation using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Estimate a small energy shift and state the approximation limit. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Use the first concepts from this section. Estimate a small energy shift and state the approximation limit. Produce a labelled diagram, trace or calculation; explain each step and check one changed input.
3–6 questions on the preceding first-half concepts only: recall, visual interpretation, application and one plausible misconception. Explain each answer after submission.
Explain time-dependent perturbation using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Estimate a small energy shift and state the approximation limit. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain transition rates using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Estimate a small energy shift and state the approximation limit. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain scattering amplitudes using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Estimate a small energy shift and state the approximation limit. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain born approximation using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Estimate a small energy shift and state the approximation limit. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Estimate a small energy shift and state the approximation limit. Work without the example, compare two cases, record assumptions and limitations, then self-review correctness, reasoning and clarity.
6–12 questions covering Non-degenerate perturbation, Degenerate perturbation, Variational method and the remaining section concepts, with cumulative retrieval from earlier sections. Include a new transfer problem; 70% unlocks progression.
Practical outcome: Compare distinguishable-particle and identical-particle predictions.
Explain identical particles using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Compare distinguishable-particle and identical-particle predictions. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain bosonic symmetry using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Compare distinguishable-particle and identical-particle predictions. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain fermionic antisymmetry using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Compare distinguishable-particle and identical-particle predictions. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain pauli exclusion using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Compare distinguishable-particle and identical-particle predictions. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Use the first concepts from this section. Compare distinguishable-particle and identical-particle predictions. Produce a labelled diagram, trace or calculation; explain each step and check one changed input.
3–6 questions on the preceding first-half concepts only: recall, visual interpretation, application and one plausible misconception. Explain each answer after submission.
Explain entanglement using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Compare distinguishable-particle and identical-particle predictions. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain density matrices using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Compare distinguishable-particle and identical-particle predictions. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain reduced states using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Compare distinguishable-particle and identical-particle predictions. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain decoherence using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Compare distinguishable-particle and identical-particle predictions. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain bell inequalities using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Compare distinguishable-particle and identical-particle predictions. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Compare distinguishable-particle and identical-particle predictions. Work without the example, compare two cases, record assumptions and limitations, then self-review correctness, reasoning and clarity.
6–12 questions covering Identical particles, Bosonic symmetry, Fermionic antisymmetry and the remaining section concepts, with cumulative retrieval from earlier sections. Include a new transfer problem; 70% unlocks progression.
Combine all three sections: Compare distinguishable-particle and identical-particle predictions. Submit an original worked artifact, evidence or tests, assumptions and a reflection. Rubric: correctness, method, practical usefulness, reproducibility and communication. Self-reviewed, not certified.
6–12 balanced questions sampling every section of Quantum Physics II, including interpretation, calculation or reasoning, a misconception and a new application. Passing is 70%; review errors before retrying.
Diagrams, virtual experiments, data analysis and simulations. Guided work leads to an independent attempt, with a diagram, explanation, trace, calculation or tested artifact. Question bodies are generated when opened in your private learning path. Programming submissions are stored as text; the platform does not execute submitted code.
Use original or appropriately licensed datasets. Practical science activities use models or supplied data unless a qualified supervisor has reviewed a physical experiment.
Open the interactive practice sampler →