PHYSICS-15 · Advanced · ENGLISH · PLANNED
Predict, observe a demonstration, draw a model, then test its limits.
Study time is an initial activity estimate, excluding extra reading, revision and extended laboratory or project work. Videos and question bodies have not been produced by adding this outline.
Complete these courses or demonstrate equivalent knowledge. These are recommended prerequisites, not enforced enrolment locks.
YouTube playlist: ARK Physics | Nuclear, Particle, Plasma and Astrophysics
Playlist title reserved in the plan; no YouTube playlist or upload has been created yet.
Sign in to save this learning pathPractical outcome: Interpret a supplied detector spectrum without handling radioactive sources.
Explain binding energy using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Interpret a supplied detector spectrum without handling radioactive sources. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain radioactive decay law using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Interpret a supplied detector spectrum without handling radioactive sources. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain decay channels using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Interpret a supplied detector spectrum without handling radioactive sources. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain nuclear models using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Interpret a supplied detector spectrum without handling radioactive sources. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Use the first concepts from this section. Interpret a supplied detector spectrum without handling radioactive sources. Produce a labelled diagram, trace or calculation; explain each step and check one changed input.
3–6 questions on the preceding first-half concepts only: recall, visual interpretation, application and one plausible misconception. Explain each answer after submission.
Explain scattering evidence using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Interpret a supplied detector spectrum without handling radioactive sources. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain particle families using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Interpret a supplied detector spectrum without handling radioactive sources. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain conservation laws using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Interpret a supplied detector spectrum without handling radioactive sources. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain standard model interactions using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Interpret a supplied detector spectrum without handling radioactive sources. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Interpret a supplied detector spectrum without handling radioactive sources. Work without the example, compare two cases, record assumptions and limitations, then self-review correctness, reasoning and clarity.
6–12 questions covering Binding energy, Radioactive decay law, Decay channels and the remaining section concepts, with cumulative retrieval from earlier sections. Include a new transfer problem; 70% unlocks progression.
Practical outcome: Model the qualitative motion of charges in a magnetic field.
Explain debye shielding using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Model the qualitative motion of charges in a magnetic field. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain plasma frequency using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Model the qualitative motion of charges in a magnetic field. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain charged-particle drifts using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Model the qualitative motion of charges in a magnetic field. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain magnetohydrodynamics using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Model the qualitative motion of charges in a magnetic field. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Use the first concepts from this section. Model the qualitative motion of charges in a magnetic field. Produce a labelled diagram, trace or calculation; explain each step and check one changed input.
3–6 questions on the preceding first-half concepts only: recall, visual interpretation, application and one plausible misconception. Explain each answer after submission.
Explain plasma waves using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Model the qualitative motion of charges in a magnetic field. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain magnetic confinement concepts using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Model the qualitative motion of charges in a magnetic field. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain space plasmas using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Model the qualitative motion of charges in a magnetic field. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain plasma diagnostics using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Model the qualitative motion of charges in a magnetic field. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Model the qualitative motion of charges in a magnetic field. Work without the example, compare two cases, record assumptions and limitations, then self-review correctness, reasoning and clarity.
6–12 questions covering Debye shielding, Plasma frequency, Charged-particle drifts and the remaining section concepts, with cumulative retrieval from earlier sections. Include a new transfer problem; 70% unlocks progression.
Practical outcome: Estimate a star's properties from supplied light and spectrum data.
Explain stellar spectra using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Estimate a star's properties from supplied light and spectrum data. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain hydrostatic equilibrium using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Estimate a star's properties from supplied light and spectrum data. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain stellar energy transport using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Estimate a star's properties from supplied light and spectrum data. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain stellar evolution using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Estimate a star's properties from supplied light and spectrum data. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Use the first concepts from this section. Estimate a star's properties from supplied light and spectrum data. Produce a labelled diagram, trace or calculation; explain each step and check one changed input.
3–6 questions on the preceding first-half concepts only: recall, visual interpretation, application and one plausible misconception. Explain each answer after submission.
Explain white dwarfs using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Estimate a star's properties from supplied light and spectrum data. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain neutron stars using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Estimate a star's properties from supplied light and spectrum data. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain black-hole observations using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Estimate a star's properties from supplied light and spectrum data. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain exoplanet detection using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Estimate a star's properties from supplied light and spectrum data. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Estimate a star's properties from supplied light and spectrum data. Work without the example, compare two cases, record assumptions and limitations, then self-review correctness, reasoning and clarity.
6–12 questions covering Stellar spectra, Hydrostatic equilibrium, Stellar energy transport and the remaining section concepts, with cumulative retrieval from earlier sections. Include a new transfer problem; 70% unlocks progression.
Combine all three sections: Estimate a star's properties from supplied light and spectrum data. Submit an original worked artifact, evidence or tests, assumptions and a reflection. Rubric: correctness, method, practical usefulness, reproducibility and communication. Self-reviewed, not certified.
6–12 balanced questions sampling every section of Nuclear, Particle, Plasma and Astrophysics, including interpretation, calculation or reasoning, a misconception and a new application. Passing is 70%; review errors before retrying.
Diagrams, virtual experiments, data analysis and simulations. Guided work leads to an independent attempt, with a diagram, explanation, trace, calculation or tested artifact. Question bodies are generated when opened in your private learning path. Programming submissions are stored as text; the platform does not execute submitted code.
Use original or appropriately licensed datasets. Practical science activities use models or supplied data unless a qualified supervisor has reviewed a physical experiment.
Open the interactive practice sampler →